The myth and the reality
Every Canadian small employer making a first summer hire encounters the same belief, usually delivered with confidence by a friend or a family member: students do not need to have tax, CPP, or EI deducted from their pay. The belief is wrong in three different ways, but the underlying intuition (students often end up with little or no net tax liability) is correct. The path from the wrong premise to the correct conclusion runs through some confusing tax-withholding mechanics that the CRA designed long before anyone hired a 16-year-old for the summer.
What follows is the 2026 reality, what an SMB employer is actually required to do when hiring a student between May and Labour Day, and where the genuine exemptions are.
Federal income tax: the TD1 and basic personal amount
A summer student, like any other employee, completes a federal TD1 and a provincial TD1 (or TD1-QC for Quebec) on or before their first day of work. The TD1 is the form the employer uses to determine how much federal and provincial income tax to withhold from each pay period.
For 2026, the federal basic personal amount (line 1 of the federal TD1) is $16,452. The provincial basic personal amount varies by province: Ontario's is $12,989, Alberta's is $21,895, British Columbia's is $13,216, and so on across the country. The TD1 totals at the bottom of each form translate into a claim code, which the CRA's payroll deductions tables (or the equivalent CRA calculator output) convert into a per-pay-period tax-withholding figure.
For a student earning $18 an hour, working 30 hours a week from mid-May to late August (roughly 15 weeks), gross summer wages will land near $8,100. That is well under the $16,452 federal BPA threshold and under most provincial thresholds. The student will almost certainly owe zero federal tax for the year, and probably zero provincial tax in most jurisdictions.
What complicates the picture is the structure of CRA withholding. The CRA's pay-period tables assume a uniform earnings pattern across the year, the employee earning at this rate in each pay period for the full year. For a summer student, that assumption is wildly wrong: the actual income pattern is concentrated in 15 weeks, with zero earnings in the surrounding 37. But the employer is required to withhold based on the tables, not based on guesses about what the student's annualised income will be.
The result, common across Canadian summer employment, is that some tax may be withheld during the summer that the student then claims back as a refund the following April. The withholding is correct given the tables; the refund is correct given the actual annual income. The student gets the money back; the system works as designed; the only loss is the time value of the withheld cash sitting at the CRA between July and the following May.
A student who knows they will earn under the BPA across the year can ask the employer to reduce withholding using CRA form T1213, which lets the CRA authorise reduced source deductions in advance. In practice almost no summer student does this. The refund route is easier.
CPP: the one real age-based exemption
The Canada Pension Plan Act contains one clean exemption that does apply to a meaningful slice of summer hires: contributions to CPP begin only in the month following the month in which the employee turns 18.
The legislative source is the Canada Pension Plan Act, paragraph 6(2)(a), which excludes from the definition of pensionable employment any month before the month in which the employee attains 18 years of age. An employee who is 17 for the entire summer pays no CPP. An employee who turns 18 on August 12, 2026, pays no CPP for May, June, July, or August, and starts contributing in September.
For the employer, this means the CPP calculation depends on the employee's age in each pay period. Payroll systems should pick this up automatically based on the employee's date of birth on file, but the most common error is treating a date of birth as a static "yes / no" CPP flag rather than a month-by-month determination. An employee whose 18th birthday falls in the middle of the summer flips on partway through.
The Quebec equivalent rule is identical in structure: QPP contributions begin in the month following the employee's 18th birthday. Quebec exercised its right under section 94A of the Constitution Act to administer its own pension plan rather than join the federal CPP, and the resulting Quebec Pension Plan, in force from 1966, was negotiated in parallel with the federal scheme and preserved most of its design elements, including the under-18 exemption. The contribution rates differ (QPP is 6.40% versus CPP's 5.95% in 2026), but the age threshold is the same.
There is no upper age exemption for CPP contributions until the employee elects, at age 65 or later, to stop contributing using CRA form CPT30. That is rarely relevant for the summer-student segment.
EI: nearly no exemption
Employment Insurance, unlike CPP, does not have a student or age-based exemption. A 16-year-old earning $14 an hour at a coffee shop pays EI on every dollar at the 2026 federal rate of 1.66% (1.31% in Quebec, where the lower rate reflects the existence of QPIP). The employer pays 1.4 times that amount on top.
The narrow EI exemptions are not student-related at all. They are structural categories defined in the Employment Insurance Act and the Employment Insurance Regulations:
- Non-arm's-length employment. A student employed by a parent, sibling, or other related party in a way that does not approximate an arm's-length arrangement may be in non-insurable employment. The CRA applies a facts-and-circumstances test: would the same employment have been offered to a stranger on the same terms? If the answer is materially no, the employment is non-insurable, and no EI is withheld.
- Self-employment. A student who is genuinely self-employed (running a lawn-care business, freelancing as a tutor) is not in insurable employment and does not pay EI from those earnings. They may pay EI on a side employment job at the same time.
- Specific agricultural and fishing categories. Some piece-rate work in agriculture and fishing is partially exempt. The categories are narrow and rarely relevant to mainstream summer hiring.
For the typical summer student in retail, hospitality, or service work, none of these apply. EI is withheld at the standard rate.
The OECD provides a useful comparator here. The United Kingdom's National Insurance system, broadly analogous to Canada's CPP-plus-EI structure, exempts employees under 16 from National Insurance entirely and zeros out the employer-side rate for under-21s up to the upper secondary threshold, an explicit youth-rate adjustment on the employer side. Canada chose, in the design of the EI scheme in the 1940s and the CPP scheme in 1966, to use a simpler universal rule with no youth-rate adjustment on either the employee or employer side. The single under-18 CPP exemption acknowledged that pensionable employment before adulthood was unusual rather than worth designing a graduated rate around.